Skip to main content
Delegated LPT lets third-party token holders increase your orchestrator’s total stake. More stake means a larger share of protocol inflation, stronger positioning in the transcoding queue, and greater credibility in the network. Use this page to understand why delegation matters, what delegators evaluate, how the Explorer yield calculation works, and what persuades delegators to stay.

Why delegators matter

An orchestrator’s total stake is the sum of its own self-bonded LPT and all LPT delegated to it by third parties. This total drives two things simultaneously:
More total stake
       ├── Larger share of LPT inflation each round
       └── Higher position in the active set → more transcoding jobs

            More ETH fee revenue

         Higher v_daily (daily fee volume average)

        Even more attractive to delegators (compounding)
The compounding dynamic is visible in every historical reporting period. The orchestrators near the top of the active set by stake captured disproportionately more of both inflation rewards and job volume. Delegators contribute their LPT in exchange for a share of the orchestrator’s earnings. They trust you to keep commission stable, call reward every round, and keep the node performant. In return, they expect a return that is competitive with the other orchestrators on the table.

What delegators actually evaluate

The Livepeer Explorer displays a calculated return on investment for delegating to any given orchestrator. Understanding exactly how that calculation works puts you in the position of knowing what levers you control.

The Explorer ROI calculation

The Explorer’s yield estimate for a delegator with stake on your orchestrator combines ETH fee yield and LPT inflation yield:

ETH (fee) yield

Where:
  • = your 90-day average daily fee volume in ETH
  • = your feeShare rate (as a decimal, e.g. 0.5 for 50%)
  • = the delegator’s stake they’re considering bonding
  • = your current total active stake
The fee yield estimate extrapolates your recent daily fee volume over a year, applies your fee share, and scales by the delegator’s proportion of your total stake.

LPT (inflation) yield

Where:
  • = current total LPT supply
  • = current inflation rate per round
  • = total LPT bonded across the network
  • = your reward call ratio (rewardCalls / n, up to 90 rounds)
  • = your rewardShare rate (1 − rewardCut)
  • = approximate rounds per year at Arbitrum block times

Combined yield

The ETH fee yield is converted into LPT terms using the current Uniswap price. Total yield is expressed in LPT terms so delegators compare it directly to the LPT they’re bonding. The implementation of this calculation lives in the Explorer’s roi.ts.
This formula is a projection built from the current inflation rate, fee volume, and commission settings. Treat the headline rate as directional and use stability over time as the stronger trust signal.

The four things delegators look at

1. Reward call ratio

Your rewardCalls / n ratio over the trailing 90 rounds is visible on your Explorer profile and feeds directly into the yield formula. Every missed round reduces this ratio, which reduces every delegator’s projected yield — and every delegator who recalculates sees a worse number. A ratio below 1.0 is a signal of either unreliability or low-stake economics. Delegators migrate away from orchestrators with declining reward ratios. What you control: Keep your node running and your ETH balance sufficient for gas. A value of (100%) is achievable and expected.

2. Fee share and reward share

Your feeShare and rewardCut set what percentage of your earnings pass through to delegators. These are visible in Explorer and are the most direct signal of how “delegator-friendly” your orchestrator is. The competitive range as of early 2026: New orchestrators building their initial delegation base should be at the competitive end. Once you have a stable delegation base and reputation, modest increases in rewardCut are less disruptive — but they should still be telegraphed to delegators in advance.

3. Daily fee volume (v_daily)

Your 90-day average daily fee volume in ETH shows delegators how much fee-producing work your orchestrator is winning. A high means more ETH flowing through the fee share calculation, raising the ETH yield component significantly. Gateway demand and node performance determine . Improve it by:
  • Keep your transcoding session limits competitive
  • Run popular AI models warm at competitive prices
  • Maintain high uptime and low latency to stay preferred by gateways

4. Active stake dilution

When a delegator adds new stake to your orchestrator, their yield is diluted by the total stake they’re joining: . Smaller orchestrators offer higher yield per unit of delegated stake because the denominator is smaller. This is why new and mid-tier orchestrators still offer competitive yields despite lower absolute fee volumes.

Building reputation

The yield formula explains the maths, but reputation is what keeps delegators when market conditions change.

Transparency

Some high-performing orchestrators publish their operational setup, uptime history, and commission change notices publicly via:
  • Livepeer Forum post introducing their orchestrator
  • Discord announcements in the #orchestrators channel
  • On-chain commission change with advance notice (one round is a minimum; a week is better)
Delegators on the forum and Discord actively discuss which orchestrators they trust. A reputation thread or introduction builds discoverability.

Commission stability

The most common delegator complaint (visible throughout the Livepeer Forum history) is orchestrators who set attractive rates to attract initial delegation and then change them. The protocol permits this, but it is reputationally damaging. Delegators who experience this switch orchestrators immediately. The Explorer shows your commission change history. Delegators check this.

Running AI capabilities

Since Q3 2024, orchestrators running AI inference pipelines have seen higher values than transcoding-only nodes. Higher fee volume improves your ETH yield component, making you more attractive to yield-focused delegators. Running popular models warm is a compounding advantage: more fees → higher yield → more delegation → more stake → more jobs.

The delegation mechanics (what delegators actually do)

It’s useful to understand the delegator’s side of the process to anticipate their questions.

Common pitfalls for delegators (and what they mean for you)

These are documented in the yield-calculation source material and are known to the delegator community. Understanding them helps you avoid the behaviours that cause delegators to leave.

Variable commission rates

The risk: Orchestrators change feeShare and rewardCut on-chain at any time. The Explorer yield projection uses your current rates and assumes they stay constant. Raising rewardCut after attracting delegation pulls realised yield below the projection delegators saw. Your response: Treat commission rates as a public commitment. Announce any changes in advance, with clear reasons. A small planned increase communicated honestly is far less damaging than an unannounced change.

Inflation rate changes

The yield formula assumes a constant inflation rate. Bonded participation above 50% decreases the inflation rate and reduces LPT yield for all delegators. This is outside your control, but some delegators interpret reduced yields as your fault. Your response: Be transparent about protocol-level factors. The Explorer shows the current inflation rate, so link informed delegators directly to that data and show the protocol-level cause.

Missed reward rounds

Every missed round reduces , which directly reduces projected LPT yield in the formula. Delegators notice and migrate. Your response: This is fully within your control. Automate reward calling, monitor with alerts, keep ETH in your wallet. See Rewards and Fees for the complete setup.

Resources to share

Pointing incoming delegators to good educational resources reduces confusion and builds trust:
Last modified on March 16, 2026